ZPK
Join the Auction
...ChevronCryptographic AssumptionsChevronImplementation Risks Trusted Setup for zk-SNARKs

Implementation Risks Trusted Setup for zk-SNARKs

zk-SNARKs require a Common Reference String (CRS) generated through a trusted setup procedure. If this setup is compromised (i.e., if the "toxic waste" - random values used during generation - is not destroyed), an attacker could forge proofs without valid witnesses.
Implementation Risks Trusted Setup for zk-SNARKs

The ZKP ecosystem implements a transparent, verifiable, and robust ceremony with multiple security layers coordinated through Substrate's governance framework:

icon

Multi-party computation (MPC) with a minimum of 20 participants from diverse jurisdictions, backgrounds, and incentive structures, including academic institutions, authoritative entities and individual contributors, managed through on-chain governance proposals

icon

Open participation protocol with cryptographic identity verification to prevent Sybil attacks while enabling broad representation, leveraging Substrate's identity pallet for participant verification

icon

Hardware security through specialized air-gapped devices with secure elements for parameter generation and verified random number generation

icon

Publicly verifiable contribution transcripts enabling external auditing of each participant's input, stored permanently on-chain through custom ceremony pallets

icon

Multi-phase approach where each participant must prove destruction of their portion of the toxic waste before the ceremony advances, enforced through on-chain state transitions

icon

Formal verification of the ceremony code using the Coq theorem prover to mathematically guarantee correctness within Substrate's WASM runtime environment

icon

Multi-party computation (MPC) with a minimum of 20 participants from diverse jurisdictions, backgrounds, and incentive structures, including academic institutions, authoritative entities and individual contributors, managed through on-chain governance proposals

icon

Open participation protocol with cryptographic identity verification to prevent Sybil attacks while enabling broad representation, leveraging Substrate's identity pallet for participant verification

icon

Hardware security through specialized air-gapped devices with secure elements for parameter generation and verified random number generation

icon

Publicly verifiable contribution transcripts enabling external auditing of each participant's input, stored permanently on-chain through custom ceremony pallets

icon

Multi-phase approach where each participant must prove destruction of their portion of the toxic waste before the ceremony advances, enforced through on-chain state transitions

icon

Formal verification of the ceremony code using the Coq theorem prover to mathematically guarantee correctness within Substrate's WASM runtime environment

Note: While the security of MPC ceremonies theoretically requires only one honest participant, practical implementations face significant challenges including participant collusion, hardware vulnerabilities, and verification of toxic waste destruction. Our approach implements multiple safeguards to mitigate these risks, but acknowledges the inherent challenges of conducting secure ceremonies at scale.
The security of this approach scales with the number of honest participants (even one honest participant ensures security). The ceremony outputs and verification transcripts are permanently stored on-chain through Substrate's immutable storage system, enabling perpetual auditability.
We are developing a formal security analysis of the ceremony using a (t,n)-threshold model, where t is the minimum number of honest participants required for security. With n=20 participants, our goal is to prove that the system remains secure if t≥1 (only one honest participant needed).

To address potential collusion risks, we're exploring enhanced security measures including:

icon

Time-locked commitments with verifiable delay functions implemented through custom Substrate pallets

icon

Geographic distribution across multiple jurisdictions enforced through governance mechanisms

icon

Diversified hardware requirements validated through attestation protocols

icon

Public validation phases with incentives for detecting malicious contributions managed through the treasury pallet

icon

Time-locked commitments with verifiable delay functions implemented through custom Substrate pallets

icon

Geographic distribution across multiple jurisdictions enforced through governance mechanisms

icon

Diversified hardware requirements validated through attestation protocols

icon

Public validation phases with incentives for detecting malicious contributions managed through the treasury pallet

The Proof Behind Champions

Those who compete at the edge of human precision now back the technology that defines digital truth.

Buy Zero Knowledge Proof Coin Before It Hits the Market

Join the Auction
Own the Proof